Establishing a set of design criteria is the basis of design work. These data are also the key input data for tackling the sizing and detailing of a network of canal system in CanalNETWORK.
Design criteria in CanalNETWORK, specifically refer to a list of parameters that defined and set to a specific value correponding to the design task required. This parameter list is constantly refered to by numerous design tasks, with out the need for the user to input data every now and then.
Note: As parameters in Design Criteria set are constantly refered to in the design process, it is IMPORTANT to spend adequate time to set values. This will save significant time later.
The following groups of criteria set are defined and available in the software:
CBL Design Settings: These parameters are used to dictate the placement (position) and size of drops when creating canal bed level design information.
Command Criteria: The parametrs in this group determine commanding variables related to the supply and distribution of water in the network.
Construction Variables: These parameters define the assembly information for canal sections to be used when creating cut and fill section geometries.
Hydraulic Design Variables: As in above, these parameters set design specifications for the geometrical shape and size of the flow section to be used for water conveyance.
These groups of parameters are carefully set for each level of canal that may exist in the project. In a typical project, for instance, MC, SC, TC, QC and FC may exist. For such a project, there are five levels (or generations) of canals, and each level is provided a separate set of values for the above group of parametrs.
Before diving in to detail discussion of parametrs and their meaning, it is worth while to understand the concept of controls.
Controls are points along a canal route that may represent a phyisical structure (e.g., turnout, division box) or a theoretical control point which is known to result in a change of either hydraulic parameter, geometrical shape of canal section, or other. As such, controls define segments of a canal route. Each segment is therefore comprised of well known and fixed hydraulic and geometrical paramters.
In the sample network of canals shown below, the MC canal feeds four sub canals. Therefore, the branch locaitons represent a physical control point. As can be seen in the correponding profile view, these are represented by solid vertical bars. In plan view they are represented with small circles as Nodes. Such controls are automatically identified and positioned by the software.
The user can also introduce fictious controls for design purposes. This could be to change the hydraulic characterisics or the construciotn details of a canal reach. The
Controls are built on a number of Node, and Segment Assembly parameters. These parameters represent hydraulic and geometric conditions UPSTREAM of the control. Changing a parameter on a control, therfore, affects ONLY the canal reach or segment located upstream of that control.
In essence, therfore, design criteria values constitute the node and geometry parameters of controls in the entire network, depending on the location of the controls. The below sections present a detailed desctiption of each parameter in the design criteria set, and discuss how they impact design or hydraulic behaviour.
These parameters are used to dictate the placement (position) and size of drops when creating canal bed level design information.
Note: CanalNETWORK software automatically designs canal bed level information, and ALWAYS uses the values for in this group of Design Criteria parameters.
There are different ways to set value for this parameter
Single value: (Fixed Drop Heigh design) specifies the maximum drop height allowed for the canal level. This value is also used as standard drop height to be applied at all the locaitons, except the last drop.
two values: Not allowed
Three values: (Variable Drop Height design) specifies setting for canal bed level design by inserting variable drop heights depending on two conditions: (a) terrain variation and, if specified corresponding FSL variation, (b) Provissions of
Fig showing Drops created using a set of three values. Whenever feasible with in presctibed prefered control spacing (150m in this case) the prefered heigh is applied. If not increment/ or decrement is applied. This results in a vaiable drop height design
Fig showing Drops created using a single value that specifies a standard drop heigh (in this case 1.50meters).
Note: In each case, the last drop is automatically sized to meet the remaining head loss in the canl reach. The values above do not control the last drop in a reach.
This value specifies the minimum allowed drop height in the canal segment. All drops inserted will observe this limit, except the last drop.
This parameter specifies the minimum allowable spacing between drop structures. CBL generated attempts to ALWAYS maintain the provisions in this parameter when positioning drop structures.
There are two ways to set and use this parameter:
Single value: specifies an absolute minimum that must be maintained between successive drops.
two values: in addition to above, the second value specifies a prefered length between drops. This second value is used ONLY if variable drop height specification is used in Prefered/ Max Drop Height above.
This parameter dictates how canal bed levels are positioned with respect to prevailing OGL along the profile of the canal route. Values impact behaviour of design as follows:
fitHt <=0 : ensure the vertical distance between OGL and upstream invert level
at each drop fulfils this value. This is widely used in the network.
fitHt>0: ensure the vertical distance between FSL and OGL
at each drop meets this value. This is often applied for feeder canals, who supply water to farm blocks, and must mainatin a certain head above ground level.
fitHt=-99: this value represents ‘Not Applicable.’ Canal segments with this value setting are designed for no drop.
Note: If fitHt is set to -99 (not applicable), the control invert level is automatically calculated and set. Hence, the user can not manually raise or lower the invert levels. To allow this, the user must clear this value and set a proper value.
The setting in this parameter is used to determine where in the reach drops must be located:
first: inserts drops at the first location where the CBL/ or FSL (depending on fitHT setting above) meets the OGL. This setting tends to reduce fill volumes and increase cut volumes.
last: inserts drops at the last location (same as above.) this setting tends to increase fill volumes and reduce cut volumes.
Figure showing drop positioning along a canal reach using First and Last options.
The parameters in this group of Design criteria set the governing hydraulic parameters for the canal network system, inview of desired operational conditions.
This value is derived from cropping pattern and climatic conditions of the irrigaiton area, The values are determined for the different canal levels depednig on expected operational losses. This value is used to size all the canal segments in the network according to the following relation ship:
Qi= dutyi x Ai
where Ai is the cummulated area that each segment serves downstream.
Note: Area served by each canal and its segment is automatically cummulated. However, the either draw farm blocks in AutoCAD and import them to the network workspace, or use AutoEstimate tool to define the area seved by each feeder (lowest level) canal. The software then handles the cummulating of areas upstream toward the first level canal.
This value controls the invert level of all the controls along a canal with reference to desired FSL level over prevailing OGL at the control. Two ways are available:
>-99 value ATTEMPTS to meet FSL-OGL at each control is greater than set value. The status is indicated in the detail view axis, as well as using Explore Solutions > Annotators > Min FSL-OGL
. Red color text indicates this setting is not met, and design review is mandatory.
=-99 means this value is not applicable for controls along the canal. The status is still shown as above, but color coding is not applied.
Figure showing FSL-OGL conditions at control for a criteria settinhg of 0.50m
This must ALWASYS be set to US Control. It specifies that Min driving head calculations are made with reference to FSL upstream of the control.
This value can be set to help design process by showing which parts of a canal reach meet this requirement, and which do not.
>0: When invoked from, Workflow > Design and Analysis > Show FSL-OGL for reach
, will show reaches of the canal route and available FSL-OGL equal to or above specified value. This is applicable to lowest level feeder canals expected to supply water to farm areas.
=-99 meanse this parameter is not applicable, and invoking above command shows no information. This is typically the value for all canals, except feeder (lowest) level canals.
Figure showing FSL-OGL values graphically, showing areas that meet or exceed the MIN FSL-OGL=0.50 Note: The figure is example only, and this criteria may not be required to be set for MC type canals.
This value dictates the head to be maintained at each junciton node (or control structure) when positioning bed levels for branch canals. This value is ALWAYS maintained between FSL of parent canal and FSL of branch canal. However, the final CBL for the branch canal also depends on the Branch Invert Raise parameter setting below,
Figure showing bed level of Branch Canal (SC_2) with respect to parent canal (MC) based on Min Drv Head value of 0.30 (a) Branch Invert Raise= Free, (b) Branch Invert raise= Fixed). It can be seen that in the second figure, the CBL branch level is fixed at the same level as that of the parent canal.
This value dicates how invert level for branch canals is set with respect to CBL of parent canal at the control location:
Fixed: forces to fix the CBL invert of branch canal to the same level as that of parent canal
Free: positions CBL invert of branch canal regardless of parent CBL value at control, rather respects Min Drv Head values (above.)
This group of design criteria parameters dictates the assembly information for canal flow section (Lined or unlined), and their placement with respect to prevailing ground level variation in transverse direction (using cut and fill shape specificaiton).
The following schematic drawing gives a general overview of possible canal flow sections, and position with respect to prevailing ground condition in the transverse direction.
Specifies if a canal segment is provided with lining, and the type of lining:
=-1: The canal segment has no lining, canal section is applied to existing formation as is. Both the lining nor the foundation thickness values (below) are ignored.
=0: The canal segment is lined with a thin lining provision. The canal lining thickness value (below) is taken in to account to form the geometry of the lining.
=1: The canal is Lined with thick structure. Here both the lining and foundation thickness value(below) are taken in to account to form the shape of the lining.
Figure: Shows types of thick sections that can be defined using Ltype=1 setting. Left side and right side show conditions where side slope is large enough and not so large, respectively.
The shape of the resulting lining section is also impacted by the proportion of values used for Thk and THK variables in the design criteria. The following image describes the conditions.
Figure: A lined canal sectoin for m=0 value, showing the resulting flow section for THK>Thk (Left) and Thk>THK (Right) conditions.
=2: Capped Thin lining. Here a thin lining is provided using Thk as a thickness. The capping length equals THK, and can not be less than Thk. The lined freeboard provission, hc, is calculated as 1/4th of the normal flow depth, and can not be less than 0.10m. The lined freeboard can not also exceed the FB provided.
Figure showing Unlined, Lined (Thin) and Lined (Thick) flow sections.
Figure showing capped thin lining and how it is sized
Important Note: If an equation is used for B/D ratio, and a canal linning provision (Thin or Thick) will redesign the cross-section using a B/D= 0.03*Q+1;
This parameter sets the value representing the thickness of lining to be applied (See above for Canal Lining Type). A minimum value of 0.001m and a maxiumum value of 0.50 is allowed.
This sets the value for the thickness of the canal lining at the bottom (See above for Canal Lining Type). A minimum value of 0.3 and a maximum value of 0.6 are allowed.
This parameter specifies how the formation level varies in the transverse direction in cut conditions. The values are supplied in triplets, and upto three triplets are allowed. Each triplet has the specification [w, m, h].
w, m, h: Single triplet specifing - consequetively - a working space width (for thick lined canals) or berm width (for unlined and thin lined canals), a cut slope (mH:1V), and the height through which this cut slope is applied.
h is set to Inf (Infinity) for the last entry in single, double or triple entry method.
Figure showing a canal section in cut using double entry specification
This parameter serves the same function as Earth Cut Shape parameter above, but in Fill condition.
w, m, h: single triplet specifiying - consequetively - top berm width (for unlined and thin lined canals) or formation width beyond canal lining for (thick lined canals), fill slope (mH:1V), and height through which the fill slope is applied.
ALWAYS h is set to inf (Infinity) for the last entry.
Figure showing a canal section in cut using single and double entry specification.
There are a number of ways to create complex cut and fill shapes in canal segments. These can be applied to the design criteria content, or to the contents of each segment.
Important Note: For any segment, the number of entries for both Cut Shape and Fill shape variables must be equal.
Recent versions can handle varied data lengths, but ONLY during longitudinal design stage. Expect errors or stalled application response if this is not sorted out in design criteria. In case this happens, review design criteria settings, and resize the network. This should resolve the issue.
In above figure, it can be seen that the fill shape has 2 triplets of B,m,H. In the cut shape however, single triplet is considered sufficient. To mock this condition, a second triplet of B,m,h is used but the B and m for the second triplet are set to 0.051 (the smallest value allowed), and 1.5 (same as that for first triplet), respectively.
An other way to create complex cut and fill shapes is to use the Canal Top Provission
variable. This allows for the provission of extra berms at canal top level, in addition to the first B value entries set in Cut and Fill shapes described above. The convnention for setting this variable is as follows:
First two entries: Required Additional Berm width on Left side, and Right side - respectively - of the canal top (Facing Down stream).
Second two entries: height of cut or fill - respectively-from CTL at Centerline, used to control whether the above specified extra berm is provided or not. i.e., the cut and fill berms will only be applied if this value is exceeded. To Apply at all conditions set to 0, to apply at no condition use 99.
Note: Below figure, OGL-CTL is less than deirable depth (set to 0). Hence, berms are not provided.
Although four entries are shown the user can input as follows:
single value: is considered taken as left side extra berm provission width, applied at all times.
two values: left and side berm widths applied at no conditions (more like a place holder, to be edited at segment level.)
Four values: as explained above.
A fifth value can be included to provide general orientation with respect to transverse grade line. This value dictates whether the first input (Left Width), is applied on the upgrade direction, or downgrade direction - irrespective of the orientation with respect to the FUS default convention. The value can be set as below:
0<=value<1: Use default (FUS convention)
1<=value<5: Apply Left width on downgrade side, and Right width on upgrade side
5<value<10: Apply Left width on upgrade side, and Right width on downgrade side.
NOTE: for the berm provission value to be considered, the height of cut and/or fill values (in third and fourth entries) must be provided explicitly. Hence inputs of one or two entries may not work as expected, and will depreciate soon.
Note: Plan view for canal routes with berm provisions may not clearly show terrain changes at drop locations.
This is the last group of parameters in the Design Criteria set. It detemines how canal flow sections are sized and positioned for the diffenernt segments in all of the canal network. For a given canal level, the following parametrs and their uses apply:
This value overrides canal capcity determined from Duty (above) and area served. The final value used to size the canal segment is tha maximum of:
Min Design Discharge value setting
Ai * Duty(i)
This if of typical use in lower level canals, where small areas may result in discharge capacities smaller than practically feasible canal capacities.
This setting determines the bottom width to depth ration to be used on the design of flow sections for canal segments. Three values are possible:
B/D>0: indicates to use the specified value as the ratio for the design. A maximum value of 10 is allowed.
B/D=0: indicates to use built in table for determining the raio for design
B/D=-1: indicates to use the built in equations. The equations are as follows:
B/D= 1 for Q<=0.20 for both lined or unlined canals
B/D= 1.76 Q ^0.75^ for unlined canals
B/D= 0.03 Q +1.0 for lined canals
The built in table is represented as a chart as follows. (Source: USBR Recommended values)
Limiting velocity prescribe the minimum and maximum allowable velocities, consequtively, in any given segment. These are used to guide design of flow sections, along with Shear stress value prescriptions. (See below table on Default Design Criteria)
The drop down list for setting limiting velocity looks similar to the below figure.
Note that, upon user choice the minimum velocity is always set to a default of 0.30m/sec. The user chooses the maximum allowable velocity. The value is set based on the average of the range indicated in the dropdown list.
For instance, in the figure, a user chooses values for Firm Clay Loom soil type with a range of 0.90-1.15, the average value of 1.0 is set, as shown in the table. The dropdown range options and associated values are shown here.
Soil Type | Range Value | Set Value |
---|---|---|
Sandy Soil | 0.3-0.60 | 0.45 |
Black Cotton Soil | 0.6-0.90 | 0.75 |
Firm Clay Loom | 0.9-1.15 | 1 |
Gravel | 1.2-2.0 | 1.6 |
Hard Rock | >3.0 | 4 |
Concrete | ~6 | 6 |
Steel Lining | 10 | 10 |
This variable defines the maxium allowable shear stress for a canal segment in Kg/sq. meter or N/sq.mm (equivalent). As in Limiting Velocity value, this is also used to guide design of flow sections.
Figure showing flow seciotn design with interactive update of current velocity and shear stress values, compared to set criteria values. Here, The shear stress limit of 3N/mm2 is exceeded, while velocity is still with in Limits.
The value of mannings roughness coeficient for the canal segment in question.
Specifies the free board provision for flow section design in one of two ways:
FB>0: indicates to use specified value for free board provission
FB=0: Indicates to use built in table for estimating freeboard. For lined canals, the freeboard is provided using the equation 0.4*Q^0.25, and not less than 0.10m.
The table of values for free board estimation are as follows:
Specifies the side slope of the wetted canal section (H:1V)
Specifies the bed slope of the canal segment. The minimum (Steepest) value is 1in 50 and the maximum (flattest) slope allowed is 1 in 10,000.
The following table summarizes default values set to different canal levels upon generation of default design criteria set.
Parameter | MC, PC | SC | TC | QC, FC, … |
---|---|---|---|---|
CBL_designSettings | ||||
Prefered/Max Drop Height(m) | 2 | [0.800, 0.100, 1.500] | 0.75 | 0.5 |
Minimum Drop Height(m) | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.2 |
Min Control spacing(m) | 30 | [15.000, 150.000] | 10 | 10 |
Fit Height(m) | -99 | -0.5 | -0.4 | 0.3 |
Fit Type (-) | last | last | last | last |
Canal_Bed_Material | ||||
Mean Dia of Material, d50(mm) | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Angle of Repose, (deg) | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
Spec. Gravity, g/cm3 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 |
Command_Criteria | ||||
Canal Duty(l/s/ha) | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.75 | 1.7 |
Min. FSL-OGL @ Controls(m) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
FSL-OGL Control Type | USControl | USControl | USControl | USControl |
Min. FSL-OGL @ Reach(m) | -99 | -99 | -99 | 0.15 |
Min.Drv. Head @ Control(m) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.1 |
Branch Invert Raise(-) | Free | Free | Free | Free |
Construction_Variables | ||||
Canal Lining type, Ltyp(-) | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
Lining Thickness, Thk(m) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Foundation Thickness, THK(m) | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Earth cut shape, Smc(-) | [2.000, 1.500, Inf] | [1.000, 1.500, Inf] | [0.800, 1.500, Inf] | [0.600, 1.500, Inf] |
Earth fill shape, Smf(-) | [2.000, 2.000, Inf] | [1.000, 1.750, Inf] | [0.800, 1.750, Inf] | [0.600, 1.500, Inf] |
Canal Top Provission | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hydraulic_Design | ||||
Min. Design Discharge(m3/sec) | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
Design B to D ratio(-) | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
Limiting Velocity(m/sec) | [0.300, 2.000] | [0.300, 0.800] | [0.300, 0.700] | [0.300, 0.700] |
Max. All. Shear Stress (Kg/m2) | 10 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Mannings Roughness, N(-) | 0.014 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Freeboard, FB(m) | -1 | 0.3 | 0.25 | 0.2 |
Canal Side Slope, m(-) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Bed Slope, So(m/m) | 5000 | 1000 | 2000 | 750 |
END.